top of page

by Mikaela Brewer ​for The 44 North, Senior Editor


“In the chemo room, I wear mittens made of ice so I don’t lose my fingernails. But I took a risk today to write this down.” Copyright © 2023 by Andrea Gibson. Originally published in Poem-a-Day on May 30, 2023, by the Academy of American Poets.


Andrea Gibson, courtesy of the Boulder Library Foundation
Andrea Gibson, courtesy of the Boulder Library Foundation

Note: This poem is not in the public domain! Please use the link above to read it. 


I’ve loved Andrea Gibson’s work for years, and was heartbroken when they passed away not long ago. I’ll always recommend spending time with my favourite poem of theirs, “What Love Is.” But today, honouring the ways the world is raising awareness about cancer throughout April and May, we’re looking at “In the chemo room, I wear mittens made of ice so I don’t lose my fingernails. But I took a risk today to write this down.” 


The first thing you might notice is the length of the title: It’s two sentences, which we don’t see often. But this craft choice sets up the dialogue, structure, and voice of the poem. The title’s language doesn’t appear as succinct or compressed as the poem’s, and through its length and likeness to prose, it tells us how to read the poem: As something brave, as a risk. The content/subject is the act of bravery, but formally it’s supported by writing that begins as two prose-like sentences and takes the risk of becoming a poem instead, like the expansiveness of life transitioning into the (seeming) narrowness of death. 


In the poem, we encounter couplets and many pairs of images—gloves, life and death, etc. The couplet form seems to say 1) ‘this,’ 2) pause for a breath on the hinge of the line break, and then 3) ‘that.’ It’s almost as if the first line is a breath in and the second is a breath out. 


Similarly, there’s an ebb and flow of thinking one thing, and then another—fear followed by belief. The enjambed lines, often across stanza breaks, amplify this stunningly:


“I could survive forever // on death alone. Wasn’t it death that taught me /  to stop measuring my lifespan by length, // but by width?”


Further, the brilliance of this poem is that it reads as if Andrea wrote it down in a notebook (likely they did). But the precision of the diction, syntax, and images is carefully crafted. The woods challenge our notions and metaphors for death and darkness, for example. 


And then, time moves with Andrea’s thoughtful, patient touch.


The spaces between God, basketball, and balloons are presumably only a few seconds of thought, but the seconds of reading time slow and swell, mirroring the expansiveness of a balloon, a court, and God. The careful placing of images and metaphor enact this feeling. We move between time periods and time ‘owed,’ to literal outer space (from the balloon to the sky to the moon). And then we’re brought gently back to Earth, where death has been happening rather than coming. So often we think of the afterlife as “up there.” We look to the sky when we think of someone who’s no longer with us. But our bodies are “down there.” Down here, really. To remember—and be remembered—is to remain with the Earth. And as Andrea remembers their loved ones, we remember them, too. 

by Gillian Smith-Clark, ​for The 44 North, Editor in Chief


A chess set overexposed in pink, purple, and blue hues
A chess set overexposed in pink, purple, and blue hues

What if the most radical act today is not to react, but to pause?

Chess is not just a game. It is an ancient philosophy of attention—a way I first learned to analyze the world from my father, who taught me to play as a young child. We’d sit together on the living room floor with a board and a beautifully carved chess set between us, as he guided me through the moves and the stories of each piece. Over the years, he used the game as a metaphor for life: patience, strategy, and the understanding that not every threat needs an immediate response. I stepped away from the game for many years but returned in 2016, when it proved to be an excellent anxiety reducer during the particular politics of that year. When the world feels like it’s moving too fast, I still turn to the board. It reminds me that wisdom often lies in the pause rather than the rush.


It asks for patience, wisdom, and the ability to think beyond the immediate move. The game rewards restraint, foresight, and the understanding that not every threat needs an immediate response; that the dramatic move is not always the wise one.


Lately, I have been reflecting on the discipline required to “play the long game” in both my own life and the world around us at this moment. We live in a time that rewards reaction: outrage is immediate, drama permeates the air in real time, and power is often performed through impulsiveness rather than judgment. But force without thoughtful strategy is not mastery; it is instability, chaos, and the erosion of our own judgment.


That feels especially true now. As war escalates between the United States, Israel, and Iran, and as political life in the U.S. continues to be shaped by bluster, performance, and short-term domination, it is hard not to notice the absence of genuine discipline on the global board. There is an added irony in watching Trump threaten to strike Iran “extremely hard” and send it “back to the Stone Ages” while appearing, once again, to misread the strategy of the very regime he claims to be overpowering. The lesson is clear: intelligence and power are not the same thing, and finesse—in politics as in life—is rarer than it should be.


At The 44 North, we are interested in something quieter yet more demanding: thoughtful attention, moral seriousness, and the long view. This issue reflects that commitment in different ways – from questions of gender and power to stories about surveillance, selfhood, and control. Again and again, the pieces in this issue ask what it means to remain clear-sighted in systems that would rather make us reactive, doubtful, or numb.


You’ll find that spirit in our review of Inter Alia, Suzie Miller’s play about the slow, cumulative violences that can unsettle even the most accomplished women in male-dominated spaces. You’ll find it in our latest Artist Spotlight featuring Capsule Community, and in this issue’s Writer’s Room selection, “On the OSAP Cuts: Could We Have Stratified the Cold?” You’ll find it, too, in the second- and third-place winners of our essay contest, which examine surveillance, optimization culture, and the erosion of inherent worth with urgency and intelligence.


This issue also includes Andrea Gibson’s powerful poem: “In the chemo room, I wear mittens made of ice so I don’t lose my fingernails. But I took a risk today to write this down.” Its title feels like its own kind of opening move: vulnerable, precise, and brave.


On the political side, we are pleased to feature work from Sylphia Basak and Cole Martin, whose pieces explore public anxieties around artificial intelligence and the geopolitical stakes of the Strait of Hormuz. More broadly, this issue also marks an exciting next step for The 44 North: the addition of a new team of political writers, including Basak and Martin, who will be contributing analysis and commentary between issues. At a time when public discourse is often flattened by speed, certainty, and outrage, we are proud to be making more space for political writing that is thoughtful, independent, and unafraid of complexity.


We are also happy to share that our newsletter has officially moved to Substack and is reborn as Points North: a place for field notes on culture, politics, and the world around us, alongside updates on our latest issue, podcast episodes, events, contests, and more. We hope you’ll join us there – not just to read, but to reflect, to question, and to play your own long game.


If chess teaches us anything worth carrying into daily life, it is this: patience is not weakness. Restraint is not retreat. To pause, to think carefully, to resist manipulation by headlines and noise—these are not acts of passivity, but of discipline. They are how we protect our judgment. And with it, our humanity.


Thank you, as always, for reading.


Warmly,

Gillian Smith-Clark

Editor in Chief, The 44 North Media


by Sylphia Basak for The 44 North, Contributing Writer - Politics


 Map of the Strait of Hormuz (Getty Images)
 Map of the Strait of Hormuz (Getty Images)

Is the Strait of Hormuz the key to victory?


Disclaimer: This article discusses Iranian policy and military strategy within the context of war with the USA and Israel. Views reflected in this article should not be taken as condoning the Iranian government and military as a whole, particularly regarding the prior treatment of its citizens.


"By controlling who is allowed passage through one of the most critical waterways, Iran is not only reconfiguring the global economy but is also normalizing the political and economic isolation of America, Israel, and their allies."

From cars to planes, furnaces and lights,  MRI machines and even clothing fibre, many of our most essential needs contain some form of oil and natural gas. One passage determines the destination of over 25% of that global supply, and it’s currently blockaded, all because of a war the Trump administration started as a final defense of US/Israeli hegemony. 


On the north coast of Iran, flanked by Oman and the UAE, is one of the world's most important waterways.  Despite it only being 21–60 miles wide, the Strait of Hormuz is the world's most vital energy bottleneck, transporting one-fifth of global oil and LNG (Liquefied Natural Gas) shipments. (Wiki)


So why is the Strait of Hormuz so important?


The Strait provides the only sea passage from the Persian Gulf to the open ocean. It’s a major source of petroleum products globally and the only maritime route for several Gulf regions, including Qatar, Kuwait and Bahrain. Disruption to the strait can cause “severe supply shortages.” On February 28th, 2026,  the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps  (IRGC) announced its closure and declaration of military offence on ships who try to pass through the Strait without approval from the Iranian government.  


Since then, “more than 18 merchant ships of various nationalities have been hit by projectiles, missiles, drone boats and sea mines,” according to one UAE estimate, quoted by AFP (BBC). The USA and Israel have responded to this blockade with airstrikes on Iran’s oil and natural gas resources, including an Israeli airstrike on the South Pars gas field, one of the largest natural gas reserves in the world. Despite this, it was Iran’s retaliation via the attacking of Israeli and Gulf nations' oil and LNG facilities that seemed to trigger concern among Western allies regarding ‘escalation’ of war and concern regarding ‘global energy supplies.’


Toxic fumes (black rain) in Tehran after an American/Israeli airstrikes on an Iranian oil refinery (via NBC)
Toxic fumes (black rain) in Tehran after an American/Israeli airstrikes on an Iranian oil refinery (via NBC)

Iranian Minister of Foreign Affairs Abbas Araghchi said on Monday that the strait was “open, but closed to our enemies.” The Iranian proposition made to the EU was to remove U.S. and Israeli ambassadors in exchange for safe passage through the Strait. Since this announcement, Iran has allowed Chinese, Greek, and Indian boats, as well as others, but overall traffic through the strait has been reduced by 70%. 


Why should this matter to us? How does it impact the war between the U.S-Israel, and Iran? 


Disruptions to the global supply chain have already started taking effect. Since the closing of the Strait, oil prices have risen by over 50%, from approximately $60-70 to over $100 per barrel (as of March 24, 2026). The bombing of the South Pars gas field has also led to global energy prices “soaring.” 

Interview with French intellectual, Emmanuel Todd, via X
Interview with French intellectual, Emmanuel Todd, via X

In other words, everything is getting even more expensive and will continue to. 


From commercial travel to fertilizer, regular creature comforts and luxuries will become increasingly limited as this war continues. Expect the prices of essentials to increase as well. The unpopularity of this war will be further exacerbated by the strain on the American and Western economies caused by the closing of Hormuz. 


It’s no secret that America and much of the world’s energy relies on the oil reserves of West Asia (the “Middle East”), and this war seems to increasingly reveal itself as being principally about controlling those assets. This, combined with increasing colonial violence both in and outside of Western countries, indicates an empire aware of its decline and determined to hold onto its power for as long as it can. Iran is using this knowledge to reshape the global power structure. By controlling who is allowed passage through one of the most critical waterways, Iran is not only reconfiguring the global economy but is also normalizing the political and economic isolation of America, Israel, and their allies.  


"Iran’s play is not military; it’s financially nuclear. What makes it all easier is that Iran is already offering the model for the rest of the Global South to follow: nearly 90 percent of Tehran’s crude exports are settled in yuan via the CIPS payment system. The Global South may eventually lock in the very simple model. Tehran is not saying the Strait of Hormuz is blocked. It’s blocked only to the hostile Epstein Syndicate – the US – and its minions trading in petrodollars. Shipping lanes are being turned in real time into political filters. As the Global South migrates to the petroyuan, the hegemonic petrodollar – since 1974 – drops dead." —Pepe Escobar, “How Iran and China Shaped the War Chessboard”, The Cradle

Many experts believe America is not equipped for a significant reduction of its oil and LNG supply, and that the Strait of Hormuz is one of the many reasons Iran is likely to outlast America and Israel in this war of attrition. Despite this, the current American administration has continued to target Iran’s natural resource facilities as well as their civilian infrastructure.


Graves dug for children killed in a deadly strike on a school in Minab, © AFP PHOTO / IRANIAN PRESS CENTER (via Amnesty International)
Graves dug for children killed in a deadly strike on a school in Minab, © AFP PHOTO / IRANIAN PRESS CENTER (via Amnesty International)

According to Iranian officials, the scale of their retaliation is yet to be seen. This past week, they have been calling for the evacuation of U.S.-owned energy centres and the continued targeting of American military bases and oil reserves in the region; 


Iran, following the doctrines of decentralized, guerrilla warfare, is far more prepared for long-term war than America and Israel, who are already allegedly struggling with ammunition shortages and rapidly depleting public approval


Statement from Iran’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Abbas Aragchi, via X
Statement from Iran’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Abbas Aragchi, via X

Ironically, the American sanctions placed on Iran mean that Iran will not be affected by this massive disruption in the global economy. What was once a major political burden has now incidentally been turned into a huge strategic advantage. In fact, America is now considering lifting their own sanctions on Iranian oil to save the economy. All evidence suggests it is becoming less and less viable to support America and Israel, but only time can determine how their hegemony may collapse. 


Sylphia Basak is a journalist/writer and activist who uses a variety of mediums to convey the story she wants to tell. Her work prioritizes a decolonial lens, and seeks to counteract and analyze Western media and culture as a way of highlighting the primary contradictions of the current political climate.


bottom of page